June 29th, 2016
STRANGE SHORE:
Edinburgh, Scotland.
SUNDRY LAND: United
Kingdom
WANDERING WAY: Scottish Peregrinations – Goodbye to Edinburgh
There are so many strange shores
and sundry lands that I’ll be visiting this summer... it only seems right to
give each its due. As I fly, train, or bus away, I’ll gaze back wistfully and
reflect on all the fun I’ve had. For each strange and sundry locale, I’ll
compile a list of my favorites and bests so that if you should ever visit, you
might partake and think, “Ah me, Sharon wuz here.”
Favorite Entertainment – Cameo Cinema for “Roman Holiday”
According to Time Out Edinburgh,
Cameo Cinema is “supposedly one of Quentin Tarantino’s favourite cinemas” – a
dodgy piece of reporting, but I suppose Time Out couldn’t get the maestro on
the phone to confirm. That supposed recommendation, however, was enough for me
to travel down the university district to catch a “Vintage Sunday” screening of
“Roman Holiday,” dir. Willaim Wyler based on the original story by the
blacklisted Dalton Trumbo. For the benefit of my brother Mark, a film buff if
there ever was one, I took plenty of pictures of this charming movie shrine,
which originally opened its doors on January 8th, 1914 as the “King’s
Cinema."
At the cinema’s bar, you could buy
delicious lunch, wine, or beer – that’s
right, “I’m talking about a glass of beer” (quote by Vincent from Pulp
Fiction), but most people seemed to be sitting around drinking coffee and
typing on laptops. The cinema bar also features a play-corner for children, and
a little tyke hammered away at a Fisher Price “Tappin’ Beats Bench” with great
gusto. Good for him.
In the movie theatre itself, the
atmosphere was so tranquil that I didn’t dare take photos for fear that the
flash would interrupt the zen-like concentration of the patrons. In one delightful
innovation, red velvet single seats were interspersed with red velvet loveseats
for couples, meaning that thoughtful introverts and extroverted lovebirds were all
welcomed but discretely siphoned into different areas – just as it should be.
All these plush seats leaned back to afford even greater contemplation or canoodling,
depending on the patron’s mood that evening.
Now, I reserved my ticket to see “Roman
Holiday” before I left the States – an unnecessary precaution on that sleepy
Sunday afternoon – and long, long before the English (not Scottish) populace voted
to leave the European Union on June 22nd. So I couldn’t have
predicted that “Roman Holiday” would provide such a timely commentary on the
effort to unite Europe with the hope of providing a more stable future after
World War II, but there you go. Either the fates are my friends, or the film
programmers of Cameo Cinema have uncanny prescience. “Roman Holiday” debuted in
1953, approximately four years before the signing of the Treaty of Rome (signed
March 25th, 1957), which established European Economic Community in
1958. Thirty-five years later, the European Union would be established with the
signing of the Treaty of Maastricht in 1993. “Roman Holiday,” quite
unexpectedly, prompts one to reflect back on the nascent European Union when it
was still a glint in Audrey Hepburn’s eye.
For those who haven’t seen the film
– and if this is the sad case, I would recommend rectifying this giant chasm in
your knowledge forthwith – “Roman Holiday” relates a fable about a beautiful European
princess (from an unidentified country that the film quickly establishes is not
Britain, The Netherlands, France, or Italy in the opening sequence) on a
“goodwill tour of European capitals”. Although Princess Ann looks luminous
because she is played by Ms. Hepburn in her first film role (for which she won
the Academy Award), this poor girl is actually suffering from an acute case of
exhaustion, brought about by her hectic schedule of making public appearances,
delivering speeches, and looking fabulous. One night in Rome, she slips away incognito
for a bit of air, not realizing the full effects of a drug administered by her
own physician earlier that evening. At a guess, the drug appears to be an early
form of the benzodiazepine sedative that would later be developed into Rohypnol
in 1970s. Although the doctor assures her that the drug will only “relax” her
and make her feel “a little happy,” the film starts with Audrey Hepburn being
blasted out of her mind. Awesome.
And so, Princess Ann ends up sleeping
on a picturesque Roman bench, and the most handsome news correspondent of all
time (played by Gregory Peck) happens to stop by the bench on the way home from
losing at his weekly poker game. Through a series of hijinks, which I won’t
spoil, the reporter Joe discovers that Ann is a princess; Ann pretends she is
not a princess; Joe pretends he is not a news reporter and plays along with her
charade in order to get a profitable scoop about an undercover princess; then
they fall in love in under twenty-four hours. Under the light of the Roman sun
and moon, there is no point at which any of these occurrences seem even vaguely
improbable.
The dramatic crux arrives when Ann
announces she must leave Joe. Despite their passionate love, which is never
less than heartbreaking, Ann is “completely aware of [her] duty” to her family
and country. They part awash in tears, but the question remains: Will Joe break
faith and exploit their romance to publish the juiciest tabloid story of the
1950s?
Fast-forward to the wrenching final
scene as Princess Ann and Joe face each other in full knowledge of their
respective identities; he is a reporter in a pressroom full of reporters hoping
to get a word with the stunning princess. Ann and Joe are barely holding
themselves together as they strive to play-act the roles society has assigned. Instead
of rushing into Joe’s arms like some stupid remake would have her do, Princess
Ann articulates her political hopes for the future, the hopes for which she’s
abandoned a man played by GREGORY PECK in his prime. When asked by an anonymous
correspondent about the possibility of a “European Federation,” Ann delivers an
inspirational speech about faith, friendship, and cooperation:
“AMERICAN
CORRESPONDENT [speaking from the crowd]: Does Your Highness believe that
Federation would be a possible solution to Europe’s economic problems?
ANN. I am in favour of
any measure which would lead to closer cooperation in Europe.
CORRESPONDENT. And
what, in the opinion of Your Highness, is the outlook for Friendship Among
Nations?
ANN. I have every
faith in it – [pausing; turning to look at Joe] as I have faith in relations
between people [the people on the stage around her look about, slightly
baffled; the press gathering stirs slightly].
JOE. May I say, speaking
from my own press service, we believe that Your Highness’s faith will not be
unjustified.
ANN [looking
at Joe; smiling very slightly to him] I am so glad to hear you say it.”
Even for a romantic story
about a runaway princess, the optimism expressed in this last scene is staggering. The
film assures us:
1. A
political leader will eschew personal desires for the public welfare.
2. An
enlightened politician will have “every faith” in friendship between nations.
3. An
enlightened politician would be correct in placing her faith in a hungry reporter.
4. Said
reporter will never betray the faith of his world-famous, twenty-four-hour paramour
for a major scoop. Not ever.
Now, I said it was a fable,
but this clear-eyed film makes all of these premises seem absolutely believable.
Only actors as doe-eyed as Audrey Hepburn and as forthright as Gregory Peck
could have pulled off this particular feat of movie acting, but then there’s more.
The film pulls together the nations of Europe (in the form of a long line of
news correspondents) to shake the princess’s hand, and all while she’s bidding
goodbye to her beloved in order to achieve future cooperation in Europe. A simulacrum
of a globalized European Union appears before our very eyes.
It is
understood that her sacrifice has already
fostered a new sense of friendship among nations:
AMERICAN
CORRESPONDENT. Hitchcock, Chicago Daily News.
ANN [as she
shakes his hand] I’m so happy to see you, Mr. Hitchcock.
AMERICAN
CORRESPONDENT. Thank you. Princess Ann walks along to meet the next one.
EUROPEAN
CORRESPONDENT. [bowing slightly] Scanziani de la Suisse [she shakes his hand].
GERMAN
CORRESPONDENT. Deutsche Presse Agend.
ANN [shaking
his hand] Freut mich sehr.
FRENCH
CORRESPONDENT. Maurice Montaberis, le Figaro [he bends forward, kissing her
hand].
DUTCH
CORRESPONDENT (Woman) [curtsies]. Amsterdam.
ANN [shaking
her hand] * [the woman curtsies again]
FRENCH
CORRESPONDENT. Jacques Ferris, Ici Paris.
ANN [shaking
his hand] Enchanté.
ISRAELI
CORRESPONDENT. Tel Aviv [he bows and shakes her hand].
SPANISH
CORRESPONDENT. Cortes Cavanias, Madrid.
ANN [smiling
as he kisses her hand] Encantando!
AMERICAN
CORRESPONDENT. Lampel, New York Herald Tribune.
ANN. Good
afternoon [she shakes his hand]
AMERICAN CORRESPONDENT.
Good afternoon.
[….]
JOE [as she
walks across to him] Joe Bradley, American News Service.
ANN [she
shakes his hand and he smiles back, Ann with more suppressed emotion] So happy,
Mr. Bradley.
CORRESPONDENT.
[he bows and they shake hands. She appears to almost speak but doesn’t, moving
on to the next correspondent].
ENGLISH
CORRESPONDENT. Steven Hausen, The London Exchange Telegraph.
ANN [shaking
his hand] Good afternoon.
FRENCH
CORRESPONDENT. Agence Press [he shakes her hand].
Reaching the
last of the front-row journalists, Ann turns and walks slowly up the steps. The
press gathering applauds her warmly as she reaches the top, her back to them.
Slowly, she turns to face them, smiling broadly to the gathering as she looks
over them. Inevitably, her eyes fall to Joe. He smiles back, then her
expression grows sorrowful. She manages another slight smile then turns away
from them, and walks slowly and gracefully towards the exit.”
Although YouTube fans have
posited alternatives to this “sad ending”, I would say that the film envisions
one of the most hopeful and, yes, romantic of tableaux, a global body based on
the mutual faith and respect of all nations – a federation for which an
individual (or a nation) should make personal sacrifices for the good of all.
In watching the film this week, I was struck by its extraordinary optimism,
considering its release in 1953 – so soon after the war, but I was saddened by my
retrospective reflection that Princess Ann’s sacrifice for “closer cooperation”
should be proven futile in light of this week’s events. Princess Ann may be a
fictional character, but should the hopes of the WWII generation be voted down?
Mightn’t this generation still offer perspective on consequences that a lack of
faith, friendship, and cooperation between nations may bring?
Favorite Restaurant – Mother India
Although I tried two of the
fanciest restaurants in Edinburgh, TIMBERYARD (god help me) and The Gardener’s
Cottage, my vote would go to Mother India, 3-5 Infirmary Street, Old Town, Edinburgh,
EH1 1LT(http://www.motherindia.co.uk).
The Peshwari Naan was so delicious that I could not stop eating – it was simply
an impossibility – and then the haddock was (hands down) the best fish dish
that I ate in Edinburgh. I ate a lot of fish in Edinburgh – remember my dietary
restrictions?
Favorite View – Arthur’s Seat and Saint Anthony’s Shrine in Holyrood
Park, which is to say, the view from the window of my beautiful AirBnB flat
Favorite Bit of Street Art – Care Bear Stare! Anarchy in the UK! Together at last!